Today, I was buying a few bits and pieces at the supermarket with my mum - right now, you're probably thinking 'Where is Sarah taking this exactly? Why am I reading a post about supermarket shopping?' Don't you worry, friends, I'm getting there.
We got to the cash register, and the lady started to scan through our items, and as I stepped up to the register she politely said hello and I asked her how she was. Not only did I ask her how she was, but, when we went to leave the supermarket, I told her I hoped she'd have a nice day.
My mother commented on this after on our way to the car, telling me what a nice girl I am. Confused, I asked what she meant, and she seemed to think it was particularly kind of me to wish the lady at the register a nice day.
Has it become strange to hear a customer wish a shop employee a nice day?
The more I think about it, it definitely seems to be the case.
Working in retail, I have become much, much more aware of the way in which customers treat the employees of different shops; it actually makes my day when a customer appears to appreciate the effort I take to help them, and thanks me. I am so often faced with rude, inconsiderate, and ungrateful customers who immediately view me and my fellow employees as a number, faceless, branded by the polo tee-shirt I was given on my first day on the job. Yes, I am wearing a tee-shirt that associates me with this shop, but do not let it fool you into thinking that it gives me an entire new identity; I am still a human being, and I am on my feet for nine hours assisting you in your search for different books, some that I've never heard of and that have been out of print since the 80s.
And, whilst I'm on a tangent about this, no, telling me that the cover is distinctly brown does not help me in the slightest; unfortunately, my search options do not include 'colour of book cover'.
But, to continue with my rant and get to my point.
It saddens me to think that simply being a nice person to the lady at the cash register at the supermarket is out of the ordinary. Although working in retail has increased my awareness of the way in which employees are treated by customers, and allowed me to reconsider my own treatment of said employees, it should not take working in retail for anyone to be able to feel some sort of sympathy and understanding for the employee of any shop.
Come on, people; it doesn't take much.
P.S For a rant on a similar topic, you may wish to take a look at this blog post written by a dear friend if you feel you would like to continue along the journey of ungrateful customers and channel your inner rage as we both have.
what sarah ate • read • saw
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Que sera sera
Today/tonight/this morning (I can't decide what to choose - it's 1.17 in the morning), I've decided to tackle an issue that seems to have become quite pertinent in my life recently (a dramatic statement, I know).
As we speak/as I write/as you read, I am in the midst of a discussion with a friend of mine about chance and fate.
At 1.17 in the morning? you ask.
I will rebut the question I just posed on your behalf by saying that, now, of all times, is the time to delve deep into issues such as these.
And so, I pose this question: is it better to make things happen in life (forge your own fate even), or to let things happen?
The more I learn about relationships, the more I realise they are so very much based upon games to the point of absurdity.
We wait until we have seen a person a certain number of times before adding them on Facebook, then we wait days, maybe a week, until it's okay to actually speak via this media. Then we take turns making moves (it's a bloody game of chess, I tell you - and yes, I did just get all Aussie, please accept it), and so we wait a week or two at a time, playing this game, and always retaining this aura of nonchalance; we love to project this idea that the other person is a mere afterthought, and we have so many other better things to do and other people to talk to that they are of less significance. We heighten our own significance and appear unattainable and thus (hopefully) more attractive in the other person's eyes.
The fact is, the more I discuss these things with others, the more it seems that it's the waiting around for the other person to make a move (and, let me tell you, a like on Facebook is absolutely not a 'move', let me be clear) is the most (although crucial) nerve-wracking and torturous part of this 'game'.
Will they reply?
Did I say something ridiculous?
Tell me they didn't detect that spelling error I just noticed from re-reading what I said and now it's too late to correct myself because they'll see I'm re-reading our conversation oh no oh no.
Which often leads one to think whether it might be better to just make things happen yourself; why wait around when you can just take the bull by the horns and actually do something, make something happen, forge your own fate and so on.
Then, of course, comes the issue of appearing foolish if and when nothing comes out of it, and slowly stepping away and cringing at your own behaviour.
How could I have been so foolish?!
How embarrassing!
I can never go to uni where they may see me again!
Etc.
I think, after much thought and consideration, I have come to the conclusion that, even though it's important to play a part in your own future/fate etc, sometimes it's best to just let nature take its course. Whatever's meant to be will be, and, after all, it's better than appearing foolish if you've tried a little too hard to make things happen and it's merely backfired (goodness, no one likes daily, needy texts from someone you've known for under a year, let me tell you).
Yep.
I'm still just sitting here waiting, waiting, waiting, playing this stupid game.
But if it works, it works.
Que sera sera, I guess.
As we speak/as I write/as you read, I am in the midst of a discussion with a friend of mine about chance and fate.
At 1.17 in the morning? you ask.
I will rebut the question I just posed on your behalf by saying that, now, of all times, is the time to delve deep into issues such as these.
And so, I pose this question: is it better to make things happen in life (forge your own fate even), or to let things happen?
The more I learn about relationships, the more I realise they are so very much based upon games to the point of absurdity.
We wait until we have seen a person a certain number of times before adding them on Facebook, then we wait days, maybe a week, until it's okay to actually speak via this media. Then we take turns making moves (it's a bloody game of chess, I tell you - and yes, I did just get all Aussie, please accept it), and so we wait a week or two at a time, playing this game, and always retaining this aura of nonchalance; we love to project this idea that the other person is a mere afterthought, and we have so many other better things to do and other people to talk to that they are of less significance. We heighten our own significance and appear unattainable and thus (hopefully) more attractive in the other person's eyes.
The fact is, the more I discuss these things with others, the more it seems that it's the waiting around for the other person to make a move (and, let me tell you, a like on Facebook is absolutely not a 'move', let me be clear) is the most (although crucial) nerve-wracking and torturous part of this 'game'.
Will they reply?
Did I say something ridiculous?
Tell me they didn't detect that spelling error I just noticed from re-reading what I said and now it's too late to correct myself because they'll see I'm re-reading our conversation oh no oh no.
Which often leads one to think whether it might be better to just make things happen yourself; why wait around when you can just take the bull by the horns and actually do something, make something happen, forge your own fate and so on.
Then, of course, comes the issue of appearing foolish if and when nothing comes out of it, and slowly stepping away and cringing at your own behaviour.
How could I have been so foolish?!
How embarrassing!
I can never go to uni where they may see me again!
Etc.
I think, after much thought and consideration, I have come to the conclusion that, even though it's important to play a part in your own future/fate etc, sometimes it's best to just let nature take its course. Whatever's meant to be will be, and, after all, it's better than appearing foolish if you've tried a little too hard to make things happen and it's merely backfired (goodness, no one likes daily, needy texts from someone you've known for under a year, let me tell you).
Yep.
I'm still just sitting here waiting, waiting, waiting, playing this stupid game.
But if it works, it works.
Que sera sera, I guess.
Friday, May 24, 2013
My life in a bag
Hello Gorman bag |
So, I thought it would be fun for us to play a little game called 'What's in Sarah's bag' where I empty my bag of junk/the bag I take around with me to uni etc, take photos of everything, and we collectively analyse each item and create assumptions about what said items mean.
This game is also called 'I don't want to do my French work or art history readings so am going to take pretty pictures of hand cream instead for my blog because blogging is an important part of my life and I'm fulfilling my dream to write instead of focusing on my degree'.
Sounds fun, yes?
Well, this is what we're doing today, so I hope you find it equally as enjoyable as I already am.
Figure 1.
The very large second volume of my Art History readings |
Yes, you read correctly. Second volume of readings. This, my friends, is just half of the reading required of art history students, and it's the smaller half as well. You may recall me mentioning the stacks of reading for uni (as above as well). Well, here it is, my friends. Basque in all its glory. You might be lucky to find a notation on this page as well.
Maybe.
Pretty kikki.K notebooks |
Stationary is something that I love. Love. So, in an effort to increase my enthusiasm for returning to study (although, I'll admit, I was pretty excited to go back), I decided kikki.K notebooks were the way to go. The colours were such pretty shades of pastel pinks and yellows; how could you resist?! Clearly, I couldn't, hence the photo above. Needless to say, the purchase of said items did little to augment my desire to study.
Figure 3.
|
I once owned a pencil case. In fact, I still do, and I believe it is somewhere on my desk amongst all the jewellery, books and pieces of paper left lying there. There's nothing wrong with it; it's a sweet little Cath Kidston floral pencil case. However, after a couple of weeks of uni, I decided "Who needs a pencil case? Not I!" Apparently living free of a pencil case would fill me with a sense of empowerment.
I can do anything!
This pencil case serves no purpose!
Who created such an object?
I can do anything!
This pencil case serves no purpose!
Who created such an object?
I clearly did not think about the usefulness of a pencil case and the use for which it was designed.
I have hence lost many, many pens.
As a side note, I bought the ruler in Paris at Versailles! I couldn't resist the little Marie Antoinette figures all lined up along the measurements.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
My slightly tattered copy of Huck Finn |
I'm actually not sure how my copy of Huckleberry Finn has become so tattered and so quickly. I've been reading it for a couple of weeks, and it's already looking a lot worse for wear.
However, I'm one of those people who loves it when books become all creased and yellowed; they have so much more character - they've been loved! My copy of Catcher in the Rye is so yellowed and lovely and scratched and loved.
I'm weird, aren't I?
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Need I say more?
I think enough has been said of these glasses.
I think enough has been said of these glasses.
Also, Jono Hennessy is great.
Figure 6.
For years, I was convinced that sunglasses did not suit my face.
I am now convinced that, for years, sunglasses were just bad; there were no nice shapes.
However, last year, I rediscovered sunglasses, and also realised that Witchery makes such lovely shaped eyewear, that I now own not one, but two pairs of sunnies from there.
What a turnaround!
Figure 7.
Figure 6.
Plum sunnies from Witchery |
For years, I was convinced that sunglasses did not suit my face.
I am now convinced that, for years, sunglasses were just bad; there were no nice shapes.
However, last year, I rediscovered sunglasses, and also realised that Witchery makes such lovely shaped eyewear, that I now own not one, but two pairs of sunnies from there.
What a turnaround!
Figure 7.
Beautiful, beautiful Nancy Bird busting at the zip |
Busting at the zip indeed! How I fit so much into such a small item, I do not know. I carry my life in this wallet - probably because I have too many bags that don't have pockets or compartments where I can put things like lip balm etc.
In fact, I won't even go into the details of what one might find in this lovely Nancybird wallet; that might require an entirely separate post altogether.
Figure 8.
My slightly weathered Lululemon drink bottle |
Goodness knows how long I've had this water bottle.
Actually, I think I bought it in Year 11.
Scrap that.
I've had this drink bottle for a long time, as you can probably tell from the many bumps and scratches (aka. dents) it has acquired over the years.
It may be metal (and therefore becomes quite heavy when full of water), but I carry it everywhere.
Maybe people will think I'm into fitness or something; it is Lululemon after all.
We all know this is false.
But it's all about the image, my friends.
I also just like the water bottle.
Figure 9.
Hello sensitive skin |
Ah, the perils of having sensitive skin.
From the photo above, you're probably gaining a sense of the fact that, through the items I carry in my bag, I'm a bit of a mum.
I carry a water bottle, just in case, and I also carry not only one tube of moisturiser, but two.
At uni, when someone complains of being thirsty, there's my water bottle.
If someone has dry hands, here comes my moisturiser.
Figure 10.
Hand cream explosions are messy |
So bloody messy.
I now carry this tube of moisturiser in a plastic bag for fear it might explode once again, because, yes, one night after work when I was ready to go back to a friend's house, it decided 'now is the time to explode in Sarah's Gorman cloth bag and get everywhere all over her possessions and into the material'.
Yet, I still can't seem to tear myself away from the moisturiser.
It must always be with me!
I'm possessive, I know.
Well, to sum up, I guess you may have gaged the fact that I'm a bit of a mum when it comes to carrying lots of things in my bag, like water, moisturiser etc.
Either that or there's something weird going on in my subconscious that won't allow me to leave things at home.
You be the judge.
Sarah
Monday, May 13, 2013
Call me a feminist, but the men out there are freaks.
Am I too bitter? Too cynical?
Sometimes I think I am.
Sometimes I actually worry that I'm too bitter about people and life and I see Miranda Hobbe's cynicism in me.
Has society made me this way (Is this getting too deep? Probably.)?
I once detested Miranda. In fact, I couldn't stand her. But, after a season or two, and once she finally started dressing herself in a manner that didn't make her look frumpy, I began to really enjoy her negative commentary on life.
Yes, despite the fact that I do often try to present myself as being an altogether enthusiastic and positive person, I really do carry a lot of Miranda's pessimism (see my post on public transport for an example of such pessimism in the form of rants).
Phrases such as "of course he did" are some of my favourites; I simply love labelling the general population through a negative mindset.
Am I a bad person?
Actually, maybe we should get to that question in an entirely separate post altogether; that might need some time and thought to process and come to a conclusion.
Saturday night, I had a 21st birthday, so I went along, looking forward to seeing people I hadn't seen in a while. But, when two girls staying in Melbourne for a few months were analysed by the male invitees as to which was the 'hot one', I couldn't help but let my feminist rage take over.
Rage I say.
As I reflect now, I honestly don't remember a lot of what I said to the guy who decided it was okay to call a girl 'the hot one' and thus allude to the fact that the other girl clearly wasn't 'hot'. All I remember is glaring at him angrily, and as he tried explaining himself, saying "No. You can stop. I don't want to hear any more from you."
Needless to say, he shut up.
I realise that sometimes we do generalise people; as mentioned, I love generalising people and categorising them - wow, I'm a bad person.
But, maybe it's just in our nature to label those around us, particularly when we don't know them.
It seems that, once the person knows and is upset by it, that is the moment when you realise there is something not quite right about it.
Is it wrong to categorise people?
If so, my friends and I must be bad people, because, the more I think about it, it seems that we do it all the time.
Perhaps it's just in our nature.
But, maybe there also comes a point when we need to take a look at ourselves and say "No. Stop". If I were the one being compared to my friend, I'd probably be pretty upset too.
But, at the same time, I can't help but think about the way my friends were compared and labelled, and then we labelled the boy who labelled them.
"What an idiot" I'm now thinking to myself.
Men.
Now, there's a paradox for you.
Sarah
Miranda Hobbes: a role model for us all, despite the haircut and brown lipstick |
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Do I look smart in these glasses?
I recently acquired a pair of glasses, mainly for when my eyes are tired and for use in front of the computer screen, as I have them perched on my nose at this moment, or for when doing large amounts of the reading I should probably be doing for uni but rarely seem to get to. I spent a long amount of time in a little boutique on Smith St finding the perfect glasses: small enough for my face that they don't look ridiculous and classic tortoise shell that fades to clear at the bottom. And it's only right that I should spend so long finding such glasses; after all, like a haircut, glasses do frame your face.
And your personality it seems.
Indeed, it has only been since wearing my glasses that I feel the representation I've been giving of myself to others may well have changed in some way.
My sister, a pretty, blonde, blue-eyed dietician working in a hospital, insists upon wearing her glasses upon her head at all times at work, though she only really needs them for the computer. Yet, to avoid being seen as a pretty girl who has no idea what she's doing, wearing a pair of glasses on her head helps her to present herself as knowledgable and professional.
I, too, must admit to wearing my glasses on my head when I'm at work; working at a bookstore, I simply look more bookish with glasses on, and this seems to instil a sense of confidence within our customers. Maybe they'll actually take my recommendation! Maybe they'll take me more seriously! I do look like a small, 12-year-old child, so anything that will help make me look more experienced and intelligent I'll take!
So, it seems I can not help but ask: do stereotypes govern our society? Are we so easily persuaded by little details that we see in others? If a girl is blonde and blue-eyed, does that mean she's simply a pretty girl? If I wear glasses, am I bookish?
Turns out, I am somewhat bookish, so I guess my little experiment hasn't quite worked out as planned. However, in my sister's case, of course, she is an intelligent and successful dietician, glasses or no glasses.
But, I can not help but add: I did like books before the glasses.
Sarah
And your personality it seems.
Indeed, it has only been since wearing my glasses that I feel the representation I've been giving of myself to others may well have changed in some way.
My sister, a pretty, blonde, blue-eyed dietician working in a hospital, insists upon wearing her glasses upon her head at all times at work, though she only really needs them for the computer. Yet, to avoid being seen as a pretty girl who has no idea what she's doing, wearing a pair of glasses on her head helps her to present herself as knowledgable and professional.
I, too, must admit to wearing my glasses on my head when I'm at work; working at a bookstore, I simply look more bookish with glasses on, and this seems to instil a sense of confidence within our customers. Maybe they'll actually take my recommendation! Maybe they'll take me more seriously! I do look like a small, 12-year-old child, so anything that will help make me look more experienced and intelligent I'll take!
So, it seems I can not help but ask: do stereotypes govern our society? Are we so easily persuaded by little details that we see in others? If a girl is blonde and blue-eyed, does that mean she's simply a pretty girl? If I wear glasses, am I bookish?
Turns out, I am somewhat bookish, so I guess my little experiment hasn't quite worked out as planned. However, in my sister's case, of course, she is an intelligent and successful dietician, glasses or no glasses.
But, I can not help but add: I did like books before the glasses.
Sarah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)